What I find most fascinating about Antares Auto-Tune is that everyone and their mother knows what it is, despite the fact that it's just another digital audio plugin used in bedroom and professional studios alike. Even people who have no clue what an EQ or compressor does somehow at least know of the word 'Auto-Tune' and even the general effect it has on the human voice.
- What Effects Does Sry Use For Auto Tune Free
- What Effects Does Sry Use For Auto Tune In English
- What Effects Does Sry Use For Auto Tune Online
- What Effects Does Sry Use For Auto Tune In One
Pitch Correction and the Auto-Tune Effect Auto-Tune Artist offers the transparent and natural-sounding pitch correction required for professional quality audio production, and the classic effects that have become a staple of top-charting hits.
But even though Auto-Tune has evolved to become this cultural phenomenon, very few artists or producers truly understand how to get it to sound like the way it sounds on major records.
In case you don't know what it is, Auto-Tune, in a nutshell, is a pitch correction software that allows the user to set the key signature of the song so that the pitch of the incoming signal will be corrected to the closest note in that key (and does so in real time). There are other pitch correction programs out there that do similar functions: Waves Tune, Waves Tune Real-Time, and Melodyne (which is pitch correction, but not in real time), but Auto-Tune seems to have won the standard for real-time pitch correction.
Auto-Tune traditionally is used on vocals, although in some cases can be used on certain instruments. For the sake of this article we will be discussing Auto-Tune and its effect on the human voice. Listen to this early example from the 'King of Auto-Tune,' the one artist who did more to popularize its effect than any other, T-Pain.
- The use of Auto-Tune as a vocal effect was bolstered in the late 2000s by hip hop / R&B recording artist T-Pain who elaborated on the effect and made active use of Auto-Tune in his songs. He cites new jack swing producer Teddy Riley and funk artist Roger Troutman 's use of the Talk Box as inspirations for his own use of Auto-Tune.
- The Antares Auto-Tune Realtime Advanced plug-in features a redesigned control panel for a faster, more efficient workflow. Basic view gets you up and running quickly, with only the most important controls available, while Advance view lets you fine tune with powerful scale editing, vibrato, and MIDI features.
- Jun 02, 2009 Oh, my ears! Auto-Tune is ruining music. To pull off any of those effects, you had still had to be able to sing. A lot of producers like to use Auto-Tune because it saves time, says.
T-Pain - 'Buy U A Drank'
Working as a full-time engineer here at Studio 11 in Chicago, we deal with Auto-Tune on a daily basis. Whether it's people requesting that we put it on their voice, something we do naturally to correct pitch, or even for a specific creative effect. It's just a part of our arsenal that we use everyday, so over the years we have really gotten to know the ins and outs of the program—from its benefits to limitations.
So let's delve further into what this software really is and can do, and in the process debunk certain myths around what the public or people who are new to Auto-Tune may think. If you were ever wondering why your Auto-Tune at home doesn't sound like the Auto-Tune you hear from your favorite artists, this is the article for you.
To set the record straight, as I do get asked this a lot of times from clients and inquiring home producers, there really are no different 'types' of Auto-Tune. Antares makes many different versions of Auto-Tune—Auto-Tune EFX, Auto-Tune Live, and Auto-Tune Pro—that have various options and different interfaces, but any of those can give you the effect you're after. Auto-Tune Pro does have a lot of cool features and updates, but you don't need 'Pro' to sound pro.
I wanted to debunk this first, as some people come to me asking about the 'the Lil Durk Auto-Tune,' or perhaps that classic 'T-Pain Auto-Tune.' That effect is made from the same plugin—the outcome of the sound that you hear depends on how you set the settings within the program and the pitch of the incoming signal.
So if your Auto-Tune at home sounds different from what you hear on the radio, it's because of these factors, not because they have a magic version of Auto-Tune that works better than yours at home. You can achieve the exact same results.
In modern music Auto-Tune is really used with two different intentions. The first is to use it as a tool in a transparent manner, to correct someone's pitch. In this situation, the artist doesn't want to hear the effect work, they just want to hit the right notes. The second intent is to use it as an audible effect for the robotic vocals you can now hear all over the pop and rap charts.
But regardless of the intent, in order for Auto-Tune to sound its best, there are three main things that need to be set correctly.
- The correct key of the song. This is the most important part of the process and honestly where most people fail. Bedroom producers, and even some engineers at professional studios who might lack certain music theory fundamentals, have all fallen into the trap of setting Auto-Tune in the wrong key. If a song is in C major, it will not work in D major, E major, etc.—though it will work in C major's relative minor, A minor. No other key will work correctly. It helps to educate yourself a bit about music theory, and how to find the key of a song. Descargar dev c++ 4.9 9.2.
- The input type. You have the option to choose from Bass Instrument, Instrument, Low Male, Alto/Tenor, and Soprano. Bass Instrument and Instrument are, of course, for instruments, so ignore them if you're going for a vocal effect. Low Male would be selected if the singer is singing in a very low octave (think Barry White). Alto/Tenor will be for the most common vocal ranges, and soprano is for very high-pitched vocalists. Setting the input type correctly helps Auto-Tune narrow down which octaves it will focus on—and you'll get a more accurate result.
- Retune speed. This knob, while important, is really all dependent on the pitch of the input source, which I will discuss next. Generally speaking, the higher the knob, the faster it will tune each note. A lower speed will have the effect be a bit more relaxed, letting some natural vibrato through without affecting a vocalist's pitch as quickly. Some view it as a 'amount of Auto-Tune knob,' which isn't technically true. The amount of correction you hear is based off the original pitch, but you will hear more effects of the Auto-Tune the faster it's set.
So let's say you have all of these set correctly. You have the right key, you choose the right range for the singer, and the retune speed is at its medium default of 20ms. You apply it on the singer expecting it to come out just like the pros. And while their voice does seem to be somewhat corrected, it's still not quite corrected to the right pitch.
Here's why your Auto-Tune doesn't sound like the pros:
The pitch of the vocalist prior to Auto-Tune processing must be close enough to a note in the scale of the key of the song for Auto-Tune to work its best. In other words, the singer has to be at least near the right note for it to sound pleasing to the ears.
Whether you're going for a natural correction or the T-Pain warble, this point still stands. If the note the singer originally sings is nowhere near the correct note in the key, Auto-Tune will try to calculate as best it can and round up or down, depending on what note is closest. And that's when you get undesirable artifacts and hear notes you weren't expecting to hear. (Here is an example of how it sounds when the incoming pitch isn't close enough to the scale, resulting in an oddly corrected pitch.)
So if you put Auto-Tune on a voice and some areas sound good, some sound too robotic and a bit off, those are the areas that the singer needs to work on. Sometimes it can be difficult for non-singers to hear slight sharp or flat notes, or notes that aren't in the scale of the song, so Auto-Tune in many cases can actually help point out the problem areas.
This is why major artists who use Auto-Tune sound really good, because chances are they can sing pretty well before Auto-Tune is even applied. The Weeknd is a great example of this—he is obviously a very talented singer that has no problem hitting notes—and yet his go-to mixer, Illangelo, has said before that he always uses at least a little bit of Auto-Tune on the vocals.
If you or the singer in your studio is no Weeknd, you can correct the pitch manually beforehand with a program like Melodyne, or even with built-in pitch correction tools in your DAW, where you can actually go in and change the pitch of each syllable manually. So if you find yourself in a situation where you or an artist you are working with really want Auto-Tune on their vocals, but it's not sounding right after following all the steps, look into correcting the pitch before you run it through Auto-Tune.
If you get the notes closer to the scale, you'll find the tuning of Auto-Tune to be much more pleasing to the ears. For good reason, T-Pain is brought up a lot when discussing Auto-Tune. Do you want to know why he sounds so good? It's not a special Auto-Tune they are using, its because he can really sing without it. Check it out:
T-Pain's unplugged and Auto-Tune-free medley
Hopefully this helps further assist you in your understanding and use of Antares Auto-Tune, and debunk some of the myths around it. Spend some time learning some basic music theory to help train the ear to identity keys of songs, find which notes are flat and which notes are sharp. Once you do, you'll find you'll want to use Auto-Tune on every song, because let's face it—nearly a decade after Jay-Z declared the death of Auto-Tune on 'D.O.A.'—it still sounds cool.
Oops, looks like you forgot something. Please check the fields highlighted in red.
We understand the importance of online privacy and are committed to complying with the EU General Data Protection Regulation. To reflect our commitment, we updated our terms and conditions. By continuing to use Reverb, you agree to these updates, and to our cookie policy. Learn More
Pitch-correction Software For Mac OS & Windows - Signal Processors >Pitch-shifters
Auto-Tune is said to be the biggest-selling plug-in of all time. How does the new version shape up against the competition?
Some items of technology have acquired such an iconic status that the product name has become a verb. The classic example is the Hoover vacuum cleaner, but in the world of music technology, the same thing has happened with Auto-Tune. Revolutionary when it first appeared in 1997, the brand name has become synonymous with pitch-correction, and many producers will now simply ask the engineer or Pro Tools operator to ‘Auto-Tune it’ — meaning, of course, to apply pitch-correction — when they think a vocal has intonation issues that require attention.
Of course, just as Hoover have plenty of competition when it comes to sucking up dust from your floor, Auto-Tune is now far from the only game in town when it comes to pitch-correction. Almost every top-end DAW includes its own pitch-correction tools and, as summarised in the Alternatives box, there are a number of very creditable third-party options also. Auto-Tune is, however, still an industry standard, and the new version 8 includes a number of new features.
Correct Me If I’m Wrong
Auto-Tune derives its name from its ability to automatically correct the pitch of monophonic audio such as vocals. This can be simply a case of tweaking a few key settings to taste and then letting the plug-in work its magic, and if your vocal is reasonably solid to start with, Auto-Tune’s Automatic Mode will just tighten the intonation up as much (or as little) as you require.
However, if a ‘set and forget’ approach doesn’t get the job done, then Auto-Tune also offers a Graphical Mode. Since the Evo release (in essence Auto-Tune 6, reviewed in March 2009: www.soundonsound.com/sos/mar09/articles/atevo.htm), Graphical Mode offers you the choice of three means of controlling the pitch: curves, lines or notes. While only one of these tools can be active at any point on the timeline, you can mix and match them as required within a single editing session in order to craft the best result.
For a number of iterations, Auto-Tune has also offered the ability to adjust formants, and has featured basic throat modelling that allows you to shift the gender character of the voice, as well as global pitch transposition and the ability to adjust timing in some fairly surgical ways. Add in various MIDI-related features and we have a pretty sophisticated tool set.
Auto-Tune 8 running in Graphical Mode within Cubase Pro 8.You might, then, be wondering exactly what else there is left to do in terms of basic pitch-correction. Well, manipulating the pitch and timing of vocals while still managing to create a natural-sounding result requires complex digital signal processing, and Antares have continued to refine and improve the core technology that underlies Auto-Tune — to the point where if you have projects based upon Evo (v6) or earlier, Auto-Tune 8 will not open them. You can, however, run version 8 and earlier Auto-Tune versions side-by-side in the same project, so this is not a significant issue to work around.
Core processing algorithms aside, Automatic Mode has two new headline features. First, a new Flex-Tune option has been added that, rather like some MIDI quantise systems, allows you to apply pitch-correction only when the pitch is close to a scale note; other audio is left unprocessed. Second, Auto-Tune 8 introduces a new low-latency mode which allows a singer to monitor his or her performance in real time with Auto-Tune 8’s automatic pitch-correction applied.
In Graphical Mode, Auto-Tune 8 brings a number of operational enhancements. For example, all the editing tools are now active during playback, and when you move Note objects, you can hear a pitched tone as you drag a note up or down to assist you in selecting the required pitch. There are also some new hide/show options that can de-clutter the Auto-Tune window or make it more compact.
Autopilot
While Auto-Tune’s Automatic Mode can produce brilliant results, it is seldom completely transparent even on a very good vocal performance. If you want the pitch-correction to go unnoticed to even the most discerning of ears, the obvious thing to do is to automate the plug-in’s bypass button and only engage the automatic processing on those sections that need a little help. You can then configure the Tracking, Retune Speed and Humanize controls to suit just those sections where correction is to be applied.Auto-Tune’s classic Automatic Mode now includes both the Low Latency options and the Correction Style control for accessing the Flex-Tune feature.
However, in Auto-Tune 8, you get a new option that can refine this automatic process even further: the Correction Style control. This runs from Classic at one end to None at the other via Flex-Tune and, depending upon where you set it, Auto-Tune applies its pitch-correction somewhat differently. Classic does what Auto-Tune has always done, applying pitch-correction to every note with the degree and speed based upon the Tracking, Retune Speed and Humanize controls, while None is self-explanatory. With Flex-Tune, meanwhile, you can configure the pitch-correction so that only notes close to a scale note centre get correction applied. Other elements of the singer’s performance (and which may contain significant pitch variations used for expressive purposes) can be left unaltered.
I have to say I was quite impressed with this new option. It does take a little time for your ears to detect what’s going on, but the ability to dial in as much or as little of the Flex-Tune option as you wish means you can specify how wide a range around the scale note centre you want pitch-correction to be applied. This is probably a tool that would actually be of more benefit to a better singer, as audio close to scale notes get tightened up so they are ‘on pitch’ while the more expressive (and hopefully intentional) flourishes are left well alone, immune from the artifacts that automatic pitch-correction might otherwise induce.
Moving Faster
If Automatic Mode can’t quite nail it, you have to get down and dirty with some Graphical Mode pitch manipulation. As before (and with competing products such as Melodyne), this requires the program to first ‘track’ or analyse the pitch of the audio to be processed. Auto-Tune then provides you with a combination of curves, lines and note objects that you can manually edit to achieve maximum control over the end result.
As with any manual pitch-editing process, this can be a protracted task depending upon how much correction and/or manipulation is required. Thankfully, in version 8, the most tangible changes in Graphical Mode are aimed at speeding this process up. For example, all the editing tools are now active during playback, so you can tweak notes, curves or lines while looping through a section of your project, hearing the results instantly as you work. I found this a very useful change, particularly when at the stage of adjusting Note objects. However, it is best done with Auto Scroll disabled otherwise things can get a bit graphically distracting, even with the scrolling behaviour adjustment available in the Options dialogue.
The Options page also lets you toggle on/off an option to hear a pitched tone as you drag a note up or down to assist you in selecting the required pitch. This is a simple sine-wave tone and is very useful, but the default volume caught me by surprise when I first tried it; a means of adjusting the level would be a welcome addition.
As well as options for resizing the plug-in window, Antares have also added a couple of new layout options for streamlining the interface and making it more compact. For example, you can turn off the waveform display in the main edit area if you find it distracting (although I found it automatically reappeared if I then engaged the Show Lanes option). Perhaps more likely to be useful is the option to toggle on/off the separate envelope display pane which appears below the main edit pane, especially if you are working on a smaller laptop display.
Better & Better
As mentioned earlier, Antares have not only added new features, but have also continued to improve the underlying algorithms used in Auto-Tune for both its pitch and time correction processes. Some comments on the current state of play on this front are therefore required. I’ve always liked the combination of simplicity and transparency (relative to most alternatives) that Auto-Tune’s Automatic Mode achieves. It is as easy as basic pitch-correction gets, and if all your vocal needs is a gentle nudge in the right direction, it is a great tool for the job. I regularly turn to Auto-Tune 7 for that kind of task.
However, over recent years, when I’ve had any significant manual editing of pitch to do — whether creative or corrective — I’ve got into the habit of reaching for Celemony’s Melodyne instead. The reasons have been twofold. First, to my ears, I thought I could push the pitch-shifting in Melodyne that bit harder before obvious audio artifacts appeared. And second, I found the workflow within Melodyne to be a little more streamlined than the combination of curves, lines and notes found in Auto-Tune.
However, having run through a few different vocal-processing tasks with Auto-Tune 8, I’m beginning to think I might have cause to change my habits. Although the Graphical Mode workflow improvements mentioned above have certainly helped — particularly the ability to edit during playback — I think the key changes are the underlying engine improvements and what seems to me a gradual maturing of how the Antares tool set functions.
While you can get involved with the line and curve editing, and these options are still great to have, I was particularly impressed with just how far I could go in using Note objects to manually correct or creatively adjust the pitch of my vocals, and how quickly I could do it. When you shift Note objects, small pitch-corrections are, of course, pretty much transparent; but when I wanted to restructure a melody line, shifts of several semitones were often possible before things got too extreme to be natural, and even then, selectively applying a touch of the formant/throat modelling could help a little. What particularly impressed me with these more radical pitch changes, however, was how well Auto-Tune 8 automatically handles the transitions between Note objects. And, if you resize these objects so that their ends butt up against one another on the timeline, you can get some remarkably smooth results without needing to go near the more detailed line or curve editing options.
You can adjust the automatic pitch-correction behaviour by shifting the balance between the Classic, Flex-Tune or None modes.Auto-Tune’s Options dialogue includes settings for customising the screen layout, as well as for the scrolling and audio guidance options in Graphical Mode.Of course, like Melodyne, Auto-Tune’s Graphical Mode also offers tools for adjusting the timing of a performance. Yes, you can move whole words forwards and backwards in time, but the most impressive element is how easy the Move Point tool makes it to select a word or short phrase and to then adjust its relative internal timing (for example, to stretch one a syllable while compressing another so that the whole word occupies the same overall length). As with the pitch manipulation, the processing algorithm used here is top-drawer.
Melodyne may still have some areas that it can claim as its own, such as polyphonic pitch-correction, but in terms of automatic (easy) correction, Auto-Tune has always been the market leader. However, I think with this release, for pitch manipulation of monophonic audio such as vocals or instrumental melody lines, Graphical Mode editing has reached a point where, both in terms of ease of use and the naturalness of the results, it can slug it out toe-to-toe with Melodyne.
![Effects Effects](/uploads/1/2/5/8/125876921/216974840.jpg)
I’m not sure Auto-Tune 8 will have existing Melodyne users involved in a mass migration but, if you haven’t given Auto-Tune a look for a little while, version 8 is a very impressive piece of software. Leaving aside the arguments over whether pitch-correction this sophisticated is a desirable thing for the music industry, Auto-Tune deserves its iconic status but, equally, it remains at the cutting edge. Whether it’s for automatic pitch-correction duties, the delights of the ‘Auto-Tune effect’ (yes, it can do that) or more detailed pitch and time manipulation, Auto-Tune 8 is still a classic.
Alternatives
Almost every major DAW now includes pitch-correction/manipulation tools within its feature set. However, when it comes to specialised third-party alternatives, the obvious competition to Auto-Tune 8 is Celemony’s Melodyne; the popular Editor version is currently €399, but there are less expensive options available. Melodyne lacks the true automatic mode found in Auto-Tune, but its graphic editing options for both pitch and timing are hugely impressive, and the polyphonic editing offered by the Editor and Studio versions is jaw-dropping. Further options include Waves’ Tune and iZotope’s Nectar 2 Production Suite, which includes not only sophisticated pitch-correction/manipulation options but also a range of other vocal production tools, including very intuitive auto-harmony generation features.
Low Latency Mode
One of the two new Automatic Mode features is perhaps aimed at the less experienced singer, but will also prove invaluable to those who deliberately use Auto-Tune as an effect. If you monitor a live vocal through Auto-Tune 8 with the Low Latency option switched off, unsurprisingly, there is a short processing delay, and if you are also listening to the unprocessed vocal, the effect is not unlike a very short slapback echo. Engage the Low Latency option and that delay pretty much disappears completely, to the point where if you monitor both dry and processed signals, all you are left with is the faintest of phasing between the two signals. Kill the dry signal and I suspect that the majority of vocalists who feel the need for a bit of Auto-Tune moral support during tracking wouldn’t even notice the processing delay in their headphone monitoring mixes.
Providing you don’t get too extreme with the Tracking and Retune Speed controls, the results are fairly transparent and, if this gives a vocalist a bit of extra confidence, might help them to leave their inhibitions behind to focus on getting the emotional side of the performance right. Perhaps this feature is not something a more experienced or technically proficient singer might need, but I can see how it would be useful when working with a less confident performer.
Pros
- Very transparent pitch and time manipulation.
- Graphical Mode has become a mature and powerful working environment.
- Flex-Tune is a great addition to Automatic Mode.
- You can still create the ‘Auto-Tune effect’.
What Effects Does Sry Use For Auto Tune Free
Cons
- A few graphical quirks when editing with Auto Scroll engaged.
- A volume control for the note preview mode would be helpful.
- You can still create the ‘Auto-Tune effect’.
Summary
Whether you want simple automatic pitch-correction or detailed control for corrective or creative purposes, the latest incarnation of Antares’ classic plug-in is a fabulous tool for the task.
USB Streaming Podcast PC Microphone, SUDOTACK professional 96KHZ/24Bit Studio Cardioid Condenser Mic Kit with sound card Boom Arm Shock Mount Pop Filter, for Skype YouTuber Karaoke Gaming Recording 4.4 out of 5 stars 82. Recording headset with auto tune microphone.
information
£259 including VAT; upgrade from Auto-Tune 7 $129.What Effects Does Sry Use For Auto Tune In English
Sonic8 +44 (0)330 2020 160
$399; upgrade from Auto-Tune 7 $129.
What Effects Does Sry Use For Auto Tune Online
Test Spec
What Effects Does Sry Use For Auto Tune In One
- Auto-Tune 8.0.1.
- Apple iMac with 3.5GHz quad-core i7 CPU, 32GB RAM and Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, running Mac OS 10.9.5.
- Tested with Steinberg Cubase Pro 8.0.5.